Rebuilding a nose thickened by rosacea
Management of Rhinophyma: A Review of Current Literature
Long-standing rosacea can thicken the skin of the nose until its shape is lost. Tablets do not reverse it. It has to be physically reshaped, and there are at least six ways of doing that — this review sets out what each one is good at, what it risks, and why fully ablative CO₂ laser has become most clinicians' first choice.
Four numbers worth knowing
What we found
Medication does not reverse it.
Tetracycline antibiotics and oral isotretinoin are used in the early stages, but neither has been conclusively shown to halt progression or reverse the structural distortion once it has developed. The mainstay of treatment is therefore physical — something has to remove or reshape the tissue.
Surgical excision is fast and gives a specimen, but judging depth is the problem.
Partial-thickness excision preserving a base of pilosebaceous units is now the usual approach, because those units are what the skin re-epithelialises from. Bleeding obscures the field, and getting the depth wrong means either scarring or recurrence. In a 143-patient series, 77% rated the cosmetic result good or very good — and 38% recurred.
Electrosurgery is cheaper and quicker, with a different trade-off.
In a three-patient comparison treating one side of the nose with electrosurgery and the other with CO₂ laser, cosmetic outcome and healing time were comparable, and electrosurgery took about half the operating time. The cost is heat spreading into adjacent tissue; a case series found younger patients mounted a more intense inflammatory response and scarred more.
Cryotherapy is simple and cheap but hard to control.
It needs no operative anaesthesia and gives good haemostasis, but depth and contour are poorly controlled, multiple sessions are usually required, and the risk of pigment loss is real — particularly in darker skin.
Ablative CO₂ laser has become the treatment of choice.
It coagulates vessels up to 0.5 mm as it works, so the surgeon can actually see the plane they are cutting in. Depth can be gauged by whether sebum can still be expressed from the base. In a retrospective study of 124 patients, 118 rated the outcome good or excellent; scarring and hypopigmentation occurred in four each, and alar notching in two.
Fractional and erbium lasers have narrower roles.
Fractional CO₂ gave satisfactory results in a five-patient series of mild-to-moderate disease with no adverse events, but cannot debulk the way fully ablative treatment can. Er:YAG at 2940 nm is more water-specific and causes less collateral heating, but its weaker coagulation means bleeding obscures the field — in practice it is used to clean up after CO₂ rather than as the primary tool.
The honest conclusion is that the evidence does not pick a winner.
Apart from CO₂ laser and surgical decortication, the literature is case reports and small series. No randomised controlled trial has compared modalities. Severity, available equipment, and the operator's own experience are what should drive the choice.
What this means for you
Severity should steer the method
Mild to moderate thickening may suit fractional ablative CO₂ or fully ablative erbium. Severe nodular disease is usually better served by ablative CO₂, surgical decortication or electrosurgery, which can actually remove bulk.
Seeing the field is the whole game
Every complication in this review traces back to the same thing: bleeding hides the plane, the operator cuts too deep or not deep enough, and the result is either a scar or a recurrence. Haemostasis is not a convenience, it is what makes the depth judgement possible.
Alar notching is the outcome to fear
Going too deep at the rim of the nostril leaves a notch that is difficult to repair. It is uncommon — two of 124 patients in the largest CO₂ series — but it is the reason conservative depth matters more than complete clearance.
Thickening can hide a skin cancer
Rhinophyma itself is benign, but basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and sebaceous gland carcinoma have all been reported within it. Excision has the incidental advantage of producing tissue that can be examined.
Why this matters
Rhinophyma is one of the few cosmetic dermatology problems where the disfigurement is severe, the treatment is genuinely effective, and the evidence base is thin. Patients arrive having been told a great many different things, because different clinicians favour different methods and each can point at a small series supporting their own.
This review was written to put all of the options on one page with their advantages and disadvantages stated plainly, including for the methods we do not use. The conclusion is deliberately unglamorous: no modality has been proven superior in a randomised trial, so the choice should turn on the severity of the disease and the experience of whoever is holding the instrument.
Why it matters to you
If you are considering treatment, the question to ask is not “which laser is best” but “how much tissue needs to come off, and how much experience does this person have doing that on a nose”. The literature does not crown a winner; the operator matters more than the device.
Who paid for this
One of the authors — Dr Lim — is a key opinion leader for Lutronic, a laser manufacturer. It was declared in the paper and is repeated here for the same reason: a review that discusses laser treatment favourably, written in part by someone with a commercial relationship to a laser company, should be read with that in mind. The review’s conclusion is nonetheless that no modality has been proven superior.
What this study cannot tell you
Every study has a boundary, and it is fairer to state it than to leave you to guess.
- This is a narrative review of the published literature, not a trial. It summarises what others have reported, and inherits whatever bias those reports carry.
- Most of the underlying evidence is case reports and small case series. Only CO₂ laser and surgical decortication have anything approaching a substantial patient cohort behind them.
- No randomised controlled trial comparing modalities exists, so no direct statement about which is superior can be made from this evidence.
- Recurrence is reported inconsistently and over varying follow-up periods, which makes the figures difficult to compare between methods.
- One author declares a commercial relationship with a laser manufacturer, recorded below.
Questions people actually ask
Can tablets fix a thickened nose?
No. Antibiotics from the tetracycline class and oral isotretinoin are used in the early inflammatory stage of rosacea, but neither has been shown to reverse the structural change once the nose has thickened.
Once the architecture has been lost, restoring it requires physically reshaping the tissue.
Is laser better than surgery for this?
No randomised trial has ever compared them, so the honest answer is that nobody knows for certain. What can be said is that ablative CO₂ laser produces a bloodless field, which lets the operator see the depth they are working at, and the largest published series reported good or excellent results in 118 of 124 patients.
Surgical excision is faster, cheaper and yields tissue for examination, but bleeding makes depth harder to judge and recurrence was 38% in one large series.
Will it come back?
It can. Rhinophyma develops out of long-standing rosacea, and treatment reshapes the nose rather than curing the underlying condition.
Recurrence rates in the literature vary widely with the method used and the length of follow-up, which is one of the reasons comparing techniques is difficult.
What can go wrong?
The consistent risks across every method are scarring, loss of pigment, and notching of the nostril rim if the treatment goes too deep. In the largest CO₂ laser series, scarring and hypopigmentation each occurred in four of 124 patients and alar notching in two.
Cryotherapy carries a higher risk of pigment change, particularly in darker skin, and electrosurgery scarred more often in younger patients.
Cite this paper
Sun C, Lim D, Bekhor P. Management of Rhinophyma: A Review of Current Literature. Opinions and Progress in Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021;1(2):43–48.
Related reading
Want this assessed properly?
A virtual consultation gives you a written report and a plan before we speak.
Published 2021 · Summary written and reviewed by Dr Davin Lim, FACD · General information, not personal medical advice.
Have some questions?
Send a message and it will be answered personally. Form endpoint — to be wired in production